Saturday, August 13, 2011

The truth behind why Guus Hiddink did not become chelsea manager this summer.

All eyes will be on Andre Villas-Boas tomorrow lunchtime as he takes charge of his first competitive Chelsea fixture against notoriously tricky opponents Stoke City at the Britannia Stadium.

Yet, had a remarkable proposal by Guus Hiddink been better received by Roman Abramovich seven weeks ago then Villas-Boas would be barking out instructions from the touchline at Guimares tomorrow in a Porto tracksuit.

Goal.com can reveal for the first time how close Hiddink came to being appointed the Chelsea manager in mid-June and the lengths the Dutchman was prepared to go to rejoin the club he led during a caretaker spell two years previously.

An agreement had been reached between Chelsea, Hiddink and his employer the Turkish Football Federation (TFF) in mid-June for the most successful Dutch manager in history to succeed Carlo Ancelotti.

But the spanner in the works was the TFF president election, which was held on June 28. Mahmut Ozgener, the former president and Hiddink’s top ally at the Federation, had indicated a fortnight before the summit that he would stand down from his post, which resulted in a vacuum of power at the organisation.

“Everything was in place for Hiddink to go to Chelsea but no-one at the TFF was prepared to take the responsibility to negotiate with Chelsea and release Hiddink from his contract,” a source close to the negotiations told Goal.com. “If there had been a president, then it would have been a lot easier."

With Abramovich keen to have a new manager in place immediately and Hiddink unwilling to end a proud record of honouring his contracts by resigning at the twilight point of his career, the 64-year-old came up with a surprise solution.

“He said to Chelsea, ‘Let’s get a top quality coaching staff in place and then I will manage from a distance and once the Turkish Euro 2012 qualifying campaign is finished [in October], I will be hands on',” the source added. “At the beginning he would have been a quasi-director of football and once his contract with Turkey ended he would be the manager.”

Much as Abramovich was keen to appoint the man who had been advising Chelsea informally for the previous two years, he would not take the risk of Turkey qualifying for Euro 2012 or the club’s central coaching figure being absent during the opening six weeks of the season.

The source explained: “If Turkey had qualified for the Euros, Hiddink would have stuck with Turkey for the season and managed Chelsea from a distance, which Roman could not risk that happening.

“Hiddink was disappointed as this would have been his final stand as a manager. He knows deep inside that there would have been a great chance of being successful because of all the players and all the money and the fact the other leading Premier League coaches are not tactical whizz kids.”

Chelsea is the only club managerial post that has attracted the in-demand Hiddink in recent times, predominantly because of his strong relationship with Abramovich. Inter and Juventus both approached the Dutchman about taking over this year but were unable to persuade him to return to day-to-day coaching.

Manchester City also made a monstrous offer to Hiddink in July 2010 at a meeting in London with a delegation led by club owner Sheikh Mansour.

City offered Hiddink £1 million-a-month after tax to succeed Roberto Mancini, equivalent to an eye-watering £462,000-a-week, which not only would have made him the highest paid coach or player in the world but, in basic salary terms, the top paid figure in football.

No comments:

Post a Comment